| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Yick Wo v. Hopkins ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
''Yick Wo v. Hopkins'', 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
==Background==
The immigration of Chinese to California began in 1850 at the beginning of the Gold Rush. They soon began to branch out to jobs in agriculture and made up a large group of railroad workers. As the Chinese became more successful, tensions with Americans grew. Californians were wary of the cultural and ethnic differences.〔''Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts''. US Department of State, 2010.〕 Signed in 1882, the Chinese Exclusion Act was the culmination of the growing tensions. It was the first of many pieces of legislation put into place to keep people from China from entering the United States.〔''Chinese Exclusion Act (1882).''. Harvard University Library.〕 The government of California worked to prevent Chinese immigrants from working by requiring certain permits that they could not attain and passed legislation to prevent naturalization.〔 Many turned to the laundry business and in San Francisco about 89% of the laundry workers were of Chinese descent. It was often the only job they could find.
In 1880, the elected officials of the city of San Francisco passed an ordinance that persons could not operate a laundry in a wooden building without a permit from the Board of Supervisors. The ordinance conferred upon the Board of Supervisors the discretion to grant or withhold the permits. At the time, about 95% of the city's 320 laundries were operated in wooden buildings. Approximately two-thirds of those laundries were owned by Chinese persons. Although most of the city's wooden building laundry owners applied for a permit, only one permit was granted of the two hundred applications from any Chinese owner, while virtually all non-Chinese applicants were granted a permit.〔only one out of approximately eighty non-Chinese applicants was denied a permit〕
Yick Wo (益和, Pinyin: ''Yì Hé'', Americanization: Lee Yick), was a laundry facility owned by Sang Lee. Sang Lee immigrated to California in 1861. After twenty years of owning the facility as an undocumented immigrant, provisions set out by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors said that he could not continue to run his facility in a wooden building.〔''Yick Wo v. Hopkins.''. LII / Legal Information Institute. Cornell University.〕 He continued to operate his laundry and was convicted and fined $10.00 for violating the ordinance. He sued for a writ of ''habeas corpus'' after he was imprisoned in default for having refused to pay the fine.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Yick Wo v. Hopkins」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|